FLIP AND SWITCH - MINORITY AND CULT FILM IN INDONESIAN CINEMA

Main Article Content

Ahmad Riza Faizal

Abstract

This research has put forward the Flip and Switch concepts as milestones for signifying when a film narrative change their syntagmatic course through characters back and forth in weight and position thus change the messages that might be conveyed by the spectators about the film. The concepts were pointed by using the semiotic rectangle, or also known as The Greimas’ rectangle, about minority issues in one of the best Indonesian film ever made, Cahaya dari Timur: Beta Maluku. This research found two flips and two switches which signify changes in course and narrative patterns through out the film. By using criterion of what makes a film become a cult film, the research sorted and opted several peculiar scenes. Those scenes can leads the film become a cult film if the phenomena criteria are lifted and established over time. Nevertheless, at present, the film Cahaya dari Timur: Beta Maluku is not yet a cult film. Related to minority issues, the film comes from a non Anti-minority issues which complements with anti-minority issues, these findings signified that Cahaya dari Timur: Beta Maluku is not a film about minority issues but what has became after all those minority conflicts are solved. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Faizal, A. R. (2017). FLIP AND SWITCH - MINORITY AND CULT FILM IN INDONESIAN CINEMA. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 2(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v2i1.90
Section
Articles

References

Barthes, R. 1977. Image-Music-Text.Fontana Press. London.

Barthes, R. 1982. A Barthes Reader. (S. Sontag, Ed.) Hill and Wang. New York.

Bignell, J. 1997. Media Semiotic: An Introduction.Manchester University Press. England.

Cahaya Dari Timur: Beta Maluku. 2016. Film Indonesia. http://filmindonesia.or.id/movie/title/ lf-c025-14-112311_cahaya-dari-timur-beta-maluku#.V14sTuZ9634 downloaded June 8th, 2016.

CahayadariTimur : Beta Maluku Full Movies (Original). Uploaded January 24th, 2015.Youtube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTodW9wm1mwdownloaded March 29th, 2016.

Danesi, M. 2002. Understanding Media Semiotics. Arnold. London.

Eco, U. 1986. "Casablanca": Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage. In Eco, U. Travels in Hyper Reality: Essays (p. 197). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. New York.

Guern, P. l. 2004.Towards A Constructivist Approach to Media Cults. In I S. G.-J. Pearson, Cult Television (s. 242).Univ. of Minnesota Press.Minnesota, US.

Hills, M. 2002.Fan Cultures. Routledge. England.

Hopkins, R. 2008. What Do We See In Film?.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 66 No. 2-Spring 2008.The American Society for Aesthetics. Washington.

Jancovich, M. 2003. Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste.Manchester University Press. England.

Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press.US.

Katilius-Boydstun, M. 1990. The Semiotics of A. J. Greimas: an Introduction, Lituanus: LituanianQuaterly Journal of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 36 No. 3- Fall 1990.downloaded March 29th, 2016 http://www.lituanus.org/1990_3/90_3_02.htm.

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Second Edition.Routledge. New York.

Pickard, Alison Jane. 2007. Research Methods in Information. Facet Publishing. London.

Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Interpretation of Visual Materials, Second Edition.Sage Publications. London.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. .1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd Edition. utg.). Sage Publications. London.

Wilson, G. 2006. Transparency and Twist in Narrative Fiction Film. DalamThinking Through Cinema: Film as Philosophy. Blackwell Publishers. New York.