Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 1999 Concerning the Press: Between Needs and Obligations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Amendments to the law, as a manifestation of legal politics designed to promote public contentment is inevitable. The theory of law stipulates the significance of developments that are deemed highly necessary. Problems arose when the government of Indonesia's agenda to amend Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the press raised concerns about the threat of oppression in the media. This study aims to determine the urgency of amending the Press Law to realize press freedom in Indonesia. This study used a qualitative method through literature studies and interviews with practitioners. The results of this study showed that Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press is a legitimate tool for press freedom at this time. It can be stated that the substance of Law No. 40 of 1999 regarding the Press is still relatively accommodating democracy in terms of ensuring freedom of opinion as human rights. However, the dominance of the media company as the capital owner will limit press freedom, necessitating a structure that can finally separate the company from the press product. In the end, the success of Law Number 40 of 1999 pertaining to the Press must be evaluated based on institutions, enforcement, and the legal culture of the society.
Article Details
Authors who publish with Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Adam, A. (2018, February 9). Konglomerat Media di Indonesia via Jalur Media TV & Cetak. From Tirto. Id: Https://Tirto. Id/8-Konglomerat-Media-Di-Indonesia-via-Jalur-Media-Tv-Cetak-CEv7
Adji, O. S. (1973). Mass media dan hukum. Erlangga.
Ahmad, I. F. (2013). Persoalan Yuridis Undang-Undang No. 40/1999 Tentang Pers. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 60(15), 357-366.
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324.
Anggoro, S. A. (2019). Politik hukum: mencari sejumlah penjelasan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 77–86.
Arfana, N. T. (2021, August 5). Zainal Arifin Mochtar Sebut Pelanggaran dalam Pembentukan UU Cipta Kerja. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2018). Konstitusi keadilan sosial: serial gagasan konstitusi sosial negara kesejahteraan sosial Indonesia. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Batubara, S. L. (2007). Menegakkan kemerdekaan pers: Kumpulan makalah, 1999-2007. Dewan Pers.
Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (2004). Utilitarianism and other essays. Penguin UK.
Besley, J. C. (2020). Five thoughts about improving science communication as an organizational activity. Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 155–161.
Besley, J. C., O’Hara, K., & Dudo, A. (2019). Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics. PloS One, 14(10), e0224039.
Burhani, R. (2009, June 29). Komunitas Pers Tolak Revisi UU Pers. Antara. www.antaranews.com/berita/68282/komunitas-pers-tolak-revisi-uu-pers
Cardozo, B. N., & Kaufman, A. L. (2010). The nature of the judicial process. Quid Pro Books.
de Montesquieu, C. (1989). Montesquieu: The spirit of the laws. Cambridge University Press.
Dewan Pers Indonesia. (2007, January 24). AJI Nilai UU Pers Belum Perlu Direvisi. Dewan Pers Indonesia. www.dewanpers.or.id/berita/detail/550/AJI-Nilai-UU-Pers-Belum-Perlu-Direvisi
Hanafi, M. F., & Firdaus, S. U. (2022). Implementasi Teori Hans Nawiasky dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Souvereignty, 1(1), 79–83.
Hidayat, A., & Arifin, Z. (2019). Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 147–159.
Hill, D. T. (2011). Pers di Masa Orde Baru. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Jamaludin, J. (2009). Menguji Ide Revisi UU Pers: Hasil Kajian dan Usulan AJI Soal Undang-Undang Pers.
Lubis, T. H., & Koto, I. (2020). Diskursus Kebenaran Berita Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers dan Kode Etik Jurnalistik. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 231–250.
Mahendra, O. (2010). Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar: Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 7(1), 95–108.
Manan, B. (2012). Politik publik pers. Dewan Pers.
Manan, B. (2016). Pers, hukum, dan hak asasi manusia. Dewan Pers.
Mastorat, M. (2021). Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Mohamad, M.M.D. (2009). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mohamad, M.M.D. (2010). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Muis, A. (2000). Titian jalan demokrasi: Peranan kebebasan pers untuk budaya komunikasi politik. Kompas.
Munugar, A. N., & Tiarawati, V. (2022). Peranan Delik dalam Fungsi dan Perkembangan Pers Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers. De Juncto Delicti: Journal of Law, 2(1), 49–59.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Workbook for Neumann Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn & Bacon.
Prayitno, A. (2019, September 19). Revisi UU MD3 dan Oligarki Politik Kekuasaan. Detik. www.news.detik.com/kolom/d-4712768/revisi-uu-md3-dan-oligarki-politik-kekuasaan
Rahmawan, T. I. (2019). Karakteristik Produk Hukum Pers dan Prospek Konsolidasi Demokrasi. WASKITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter, 2(2), 1–16.
Ratcliffe, S. (2018). Oxford Essential Quotations, viewed 12 May 2021.
Redi, A. (2018). Hukum pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sinar Grafika.
Ritonga, R. (2021). Rontoknya independensi pers cetak dan online di Kota Medan. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 9(1), 26–39.
Rodgers, J. (2020). ‘Russia is all right’ British newspaper reporting of the Russian Revolution of February 1917. Media History, 26(4), 424–436.
Ruswandi, A. (2004). Menakar Kadar Kebebasan Pers Indonesia. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 5(2), 265–274.
Saptohadi, S. (2011). Pasang surut kebebasan pers di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(1), 127–138.
Sari, R. W., Winarti, M., & Darmawan, W. (2021). Perkembangan Surat Kabar dalam Pusaran Politik: Kajian Surat Kabar Sinar Harapan 1961–1986. FACTUM: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah, 10(2), 51–60.
Smith, E. C. (1986). Pembredelan Pers di Indonesia, 1949-1965. Pustaka Grafiti Pers.
Solihutaufa, E. (2022). Pers dalam Demokratisasi di Indonesia: Kajian Tentang Peranan Pers dalam Peristiwa Revolusi Mei 1998. Jurnal Dialektika Politik, 6(2), 152–174.
Wijayanto, D. (2014). Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.