Political Communications in the Public Sphere Student Protest in Indonesia 2019-2020

Main Article Content

Erik Ardiyanto

Abstract

The government and the parliament have decided to pass problematic bills, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission Bill (RUU KPK), the Criminal Code Bill (RUU KUHP), and the Omnibus Law (RUU Cipta Kerja) into laws. The reasons behind the passage of the bills irto laws are to make bureaucracy easier and facilitate foreign investment inflows to Indonesia. However, the decision-making process failed to involve elements of the community, such as academics, workers, working class, press, and related stakeholders. Consequently, students staged rallies to protest against the passage of the bills into laws in 2019 – 2020. This researchuses an approach qualitative methodology with a critical paradigm. The goal of critical theory is to change a reality that is always unbalanced and dominated.This research tries to encourage change towards a better society and emancipations. The data analysis technique comprises analysis of information sources from the mass media and analysis of research documents. The results of this study find that students had two strategic political communications during the protest. First, the social media movement sent hash tagged messages such as #Reformasidikorupsi #Gejayanmemangil and #Mositidakpercaya. Second, student staged demonstrations in front of the Presidential Place and the House of Representatives Building. When the government and parliament conspire  with oligarchs to make policies to maintain power, then  conflicts of interest with society, and  student protests will be inevitable.  As a result, the students have declared a motion of no confidence for parliament in a non-parliamentary participatory democratic system.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ardiyanto, E. (2021). Political Communications in the Public Sphere Student Protest in Indonesia 2019-2020. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v6i2.589
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Erik Ardiyanto, Department of Communication, Universitas Paramadina Jl. Gatot Subroto No. Kav 97, Jakarta and 12790 - Indonesia

Department of communications

References

(IJR), I. f. (2019). There are 13 Controversial Law Enforcement. https://icjr.or.id/.

Allsop, B. (2019). The "Youthquake" in British Politics: Myth or Reality? Journal IMDPI Societes 2019, 9(4),68; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9040068.

Althusser, L. (2015). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards and Investigation). (M. Z. Hussein, Penerj.) IndoProgress.

Arianto, B. (2021). Social Media as Channeling Ctiizenship Aspirations: A Discussion Study on the Job Creation Bill. Journal PIKMA, https://doi.org/10.24076/pikma.v3i2.469.

Arita, H., & Aida, A. (2020). Childer's Protest in relations to climate emergency: A qualitative study on a new form of resistance promoting politcal and social change. Journal Sage, https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219879970.

Besman, A., & Sjuchro, D. W. (2021). Management Issues in The Soekarno Era. Journal RIGE, https://rigeo.org/submit-a-menuscript/index.php/submission/article/view/723/689.

BPS. (2020). Index Perception Corruption. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/08/31/.

Budharjo, M. (2008). Basic Political Science. Gramedia Pustaka.

Chirs. (2020). Chile Vote Scrap Pinocet - Contitution.

CNN. (2020). Hastag motion not belief deny omnibus law trending on tiktok. https://www.cnnindonesia.com.

David IIkiw, S. M. (2020). "School Strike 4 Climate": Social Media and The International Youth Protest on Climate Change. Journal Cogito, https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2768.

De, Z. G., H. M., & P, Z. (2014). Social Media Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationship. Journal of Communcations, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103.

Debora, Y. (2020). List of Problematic Article and Controversy of the Omnibus Law on the Job Creation BiLL. Tirto.id.

Dezin, Norman K, & Lincoln Yvonnes. (2009). Handbooks of Qualitaitive Research. (e. Dariyanto, Penerj.) Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Reference Sholar.

Eka, P. C., Budiyono, & Sujitro. (2013). Yongmen's Role in National Movement of Indonesia In 1908 - 1998. https://repository.unej.ac.id/.

Fakrur, R. M., & Fedryyansyah, M. (2020). Conflict between CIvil Society Movement and Goverment In the Process of Drafting The Omnibus Bill Law. Journal Colaboration Conflict Resolution, https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v2i2.28147.

Fhami, I. (2020). The trend of rejection of Omnibus Law Is getting lower. https://pers.droneemprit.id/.

Fifi, M., Ranang, A., & Sugiartono. (2020). Revolution of Poster Protes Language Styles Z Generations In Indonesia. ParlArch's Journal of Archaeology, Egypt/Egyptology 17(8),75-89 . ISSN 1567-214X.

Fuchs, C. (2020). Communications and Capitalism A Critical Theory. London: University Westminster Press.

Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory Communicative Action, Volume 1, Reason adn Rationaization. (T. McCarty, Penerj.) Boston Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communication Action, Volume 2Llifeworld and System Critique of Functionalist Reason Tranlated by Thomas McCarty. Boston, Massachusset: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1997). The Structural Transformation of The Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Massachessets: Cambridge Massachusetts.

Hamid, A. (2020). Analysis of The Importance of Omnibus Law "CIpta Kerja" In Indonesia. Scientific Research and management, Doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v8i08.IIao1.

Hazim. (2015). Social and Psychological Impacst For Refugees after the COnflict Betwen Sunni and Shia in Sampang. Madura Journal Psychologi University Sukoharjo, https://doi.org/10.21070/psikologia.v3i1.107.

Hidayah, Y., Miwatizal Trhastutu, Oom Yomi, Romlah, Muhamad Mona Adha, & Rusti Auliya Ulfa. (2021). #Gejayanmemanggil as Social Communications of Student Movement In Yogyakarta. Journal of Education Psycology and Consulting, https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/.

Indonesia, A. I. (2020). Employment Cluster Comments in the Job Creation Bill. Amnesty International Indonesia.

Izad, R. (2017). The Phenomenon of Blasphemy in Islam and Pacasila Philosphy Perspective (Case study Against Demonstration II on 04 November 2016). Journal Pangkaran UIN Suan Kalijaga, http://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2017.0101-10.

James, S., & M. H. (2017). Youthquake The Rise of Young Cosmopolitans in Britain,. Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics.

Jiwandono, I. S., & Itsna Oktaviyanti. (2020). The Analysis of Student Demonstration Action Against RU KUHP and RUU KPK Betwen Critical and Narcissistic Attitudes. Journal of Etic Democracy, DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v5i2.3040.

King, P. (2017). Disintegration In Indonesia since Suharto. Journal Policy and Society Associetes, https://doi.org/10.10116/S14449-4035(6)70087-X.

Maiwan, M. (2014). Student Movement In Indonesia within have capturing power New Order. Journal UNJ, https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v14i1.6504 .

Mische, A. (2008). Communication adn Contetion Across Brazilian Youth, Partisan Public. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nursyami, S. E., Nita Komala Dewi, & Intiah Dindah Taqqiyah. (2020). Analysis Message within Twitter@AnandaBadudu with the periode 22-26 September on 2019 looking for objectivity and regulation law ITE. Journal Communications UPI YAI, https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/.

Orinaldi, M. (2020). Among Law Relations in the era of the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Indonesia Economy. Mangement Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v5i2.194.

RIdho, I. (2020). www.change.org. Diambil kembali dari https://www.change.org/p/tolak-ruu-omnibus-law-cipta-lapangan-kerja-mositidakpercaya.

Roosa, J. (2008). The Pretext for the Massacre of the September 30th Movement and the Suhato Coup. Hasta Mitra.

Sanny Nofrima, A. N. (2020). Cyber - Activism on Dissemination of #gejayanmemanggil Yogyakarta's Student Movement. Journal Study of Commuication, Doi:10.25139/jsk.v4i1.2091. .

Sari. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Case Proposed Against the Ahmadiyah Congregation in Cikeusik. Journal Communcation Untar, http://doi.10.24912/jk.v10i1.1507.

Sindunata. (2019). Dilemma Effort Rational People, Critical Theory Frankfurt School, Max Horkheimer & Theodor W Adorn. Gramedia Pustaka.

Soehartono, A. F., & Mely Noviriyanti. (2019). Conflict Dynamics In the Anti Extraditional Law Amendement. Journa Digitall Transformation Brawijaya, https://transformasiglobal.ub.ac.id/index.php/trans/article/view/152/98.

Suta, A. J., Achmad Nurmandi, Dyah Mutiarin, & Salahudin. (2021). Using Social Media as Tools of Social Movement and Social Protest in Omnibus Law of Job Creation Bill Policy Making Process In Indonesial. Advemces in DIgtal Science, ICADS2021,26-274,2021https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_24.

Syahri, A. (2019). Analysis of Student and Goverment Conflicts in Indonesia over the KPK Law and the Criminal COde Bill (Conflict Management Evaluation Approach and Organizational Communication). Journal STAIN, e-jurnal.staisumatra-medan.ac.id.

Taspell, R. (2017). Media Power In Indonesia, Oligarchs, Citizen and The Digital Revolution. Rowan & Litterfield International Ltd.

Valezuela, S., Arturo Arriagada, & Adres Scherman. (2012). The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile. Journal of Communications, Pages299–314, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x.

Vidya, M., & Suwanta, N. (2017). Macrostructural Discourse Analysi of Ahok's News in the 2017 DKI Jakarta Elections. Journal Kanal University Muhamadiyah Sukoharjo, https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v5i2.1479Wulan.

Walhi. (2020). Who is the Sponsor Behind the Omnibus Law Task Forse and Panja? https://www.walhi.or.id/.

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.