Analysis of Dispute over Authority to Conduct Journalist Competency Tests Following Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 38/PUU/XIX/2021

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v9i1.1063

Main Article Content

Yusuf Muhamad Said
IBLAM School of Law Jl. Poltangan Raya No. 6 Jagakarsa, Jakarta 12530 – Indonesia
Rajab Ritonga
PAINAN School of Law Jl. Raya Serang Km 18,2 Sukanegara, Bojong Cikupa, Tangerang 15710 – Indonesia

Abstract

This study discusses a dispute between the Press Council (DP) and the National Board for Profession Certification (BNSP) over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests (UKW) using   Hans Kelsen’s and Hans Kaviasky’s Theory of Hierarchy of Law. This research was conducted through a qualitative approach using a normative judicial method in analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Decision No.38/PPU-XIX/2021 concerning the authority to conduct journalist competency tests. Secondary data of this research was obtained through literature and document studies. This research found that there has been no final clarification on the settlement of the legal dispute between DP and BNSP over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests following the Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 38/PPU-XIX/2021 rejecting in full the applicants’ plea. The legal implication of the decision is that both DP and BNSP can continue to conduct journalist competency tests respectively.     

Article Details

How to Cite
Said, Y. M., & Ritonga, R. (2024). Analysis of Dispute over Authority to Conduct Journalist Competency Tests Following Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 38/PUU/XIX/2021. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(1), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v9i1.1063
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): June 2024 - Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia agrees to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
 
 

References

Alfian. (1987). Pers Pancasila dan Studi Jurnalistik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Penerangan RI.

Antony, Z. (2022). Konstitusionalitas Dewan Pers Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Judicial Reviwe UU Pers. University of Bengkulu Law Journal, 7(1), 34-44.

Ashshafa, B. (2007). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Renika Cipta

Asshiddiqie, J. & Safa‟at, M.A. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI

Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Format Kelembagaan Negara dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan dalam UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: FH-UII Press

Budiardjo, M. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Dewan Pers. (2019). Dewan Pers Periode 2019 – 2022. Jakarta: Dewan Pers

Koentjaraningrat. (1972). Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Dian Pustaka

Manan, B. (2010). Menjaga Kemerdekaan Pers di Pusaran Hukum. Jakarta: Dewan Pers

Oetama, J. (2001). Pers Indonesia Berkomunikasi dalam Masyarakat Tidak Tulus. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Peraturan Pemerintah No 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Badan Nasonal Sertifikasi Profesi

Pramesti, J.T.A. (April 11, 2024). Hirarki Perundang-undangan di Indonesia, dalam https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hierarki-peraturan-perundang-undangan-di-indonesia-cl4012/

Putusan MK No 38 Tahun 2022 (JR) Pasal 15 huru f UU No 40 Tahun 1999.

Rahmadi, R. (1990). Perbandingan Sistem Pers. Jakarta: Gramedia

Republik Indonesia. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Indonesia

Ritonga, R. (2021). Pers dan Integrasi Nasional: Studi tentang Intervensi Pemerintahan Orde Baru terhadap Pemberitaan LKBN Antara untuk Mempertahankan Integrasi Nasional. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Siebert, S.F., Peterson, T & Schramm, W. (1986). Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. University of Illinois Press

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta

Sukarno. (1986). Pers Bebas Bertanggung Jawab: Himpunan Pidato/Ceramah Dirjen Pembinaan Pers dan Grafika. Jakarta: Departemen Penerangan RI.

Susanti, B. (2017). Menyoal Jenis dan Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Jentera. 1(2). 128-143.

Sukardi, W.A. et al. (2010). Standar Kompetensi Wartawan. Jakarta: Dewan Pers

Soeprapto, M.F.I., & Attamimi, A.H.S. (1998). Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Dasar dan Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Soemardjan, S. (1964). Setangkai Bunga Sosiologi. Jakarta: Jajasan Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Suteki. (2020). Metode Penetian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Undang Undang No 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers

Undang Undang No 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Tenaga Kerja

Undang Undang No 11 Tahun1966 tentang Pokok-pokok Pers

Undang Undang No 4 Tahun 1967 Jo. UU No 11 Tahun 1966

Wonohito, M. (1986). Teknik Jurnalistik Sistem Pers Panca Sila. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Kedaulatan Rakyat

Yusuf, M (2021). Perusahaan Pers Wajib Berbadan Hukum. Sitax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(7), 3648-3658.